Crop Scientists Want Farmers To Limit Bt Corn To 75 Percent Of Their Acreage
Article originally published in July 1998
University entomologists from across the corn belt have a message that
may leave many farmers shaking their heads.
The message has two parts. First, the easy part: University trials
show that new corn varieties with the gene for Bt toxin work great to control
the European corn borer. Now, the confusing part: Farmers who plant these
Bt varieties should plant non-Bt varieties next to them on 25 percent of
their acreage.
If Bt corn hybrids are so great, why should farmers voluntarily limit
their use?
The experts say that farmers who fail to follow these guidelines risk
producing new corn insect populations that are immune to the Bt toxin. If
that happens, farmers would lose the most promising new insect management
tool in decades.
"Farmers, educators and seed companies all have the same goal here,"
says University of Wisconsin-Madison entomologist John Wedberg. "We
all want to keep this new tool available as long as possible."
Wedberg was one of 28 scientists who recently contributed to a report
on Bt corn and the European corn borer. The report explains what has to
be done to keep the new Bt hybrids successful in the long term.
The Bt hybrids are so named because they contain a gene from the bacterium
Bacillus thuringiensis. Corn plants with the gene produce a protein that
is toxic to certain insects that eat it, but harmless to people and livestock.
Wedberg and UW-Madison agronomist Joe Lauer have tested new Bt hybrids
at the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Arlington, Hancock and
Lancaster Agricultural Research Stations over several years. The trials
with Bt corn have produced very clean plants, according to the two CALS
and UW-Madison Extension crop specialists. The Bt hybrids were virtually
untouched by European corn borers, even when Wedberg inoculated corn plants
with borer egg masses during the summer.
"The technology is truly amazing," Lauer says. "It may
well revolutionize how farmers grow corn."
Scientists, however, are certain that unless farmers manage Bt corn wisely,
its widespread use will lead to insect populations that are resistant to
the Bt toxin.
Widespread and repeated use of an insecticide kills most insect pests
initially. However, such use immediately begins to select for the few individual
insects, which for unusual genetic reasons, can survive and reproduce despite
that compound. When these survivors mate with each other, they pass on
the genes for insecticide resistance, producing a population of resistant
insects. Insect pests have become resistant to many insecticides and to
Bt where it was applied as a spray, Wedberg says.
Slowing down the selection of insects able to resist an insecticide -
and keeping pesticides effective - is called managing pest resistance.
Wedberg says the best thing farmers can do to keep Bt corn effective against
borers is to plant non-Bt hybrids on a substantial fraction of their corn
acreage.
"Entomologists from across the region recommend that growers plant
non-Bt hybrids on approximately 25 percent of their corn acreage,"
he says. "We want the non-Bt acres mixed in with the Bt corn, not acres
planted far away. Ideally these would be blocks or strips in the Bt field."
The scientists call these non-Bt corn areas refuges because they protect
the corn borers that can be killed by the Bt toxin. Maintaining field populations
of borers that are susceptible to Bt slows or stops the development of resistance.
When the occasional Bt-resistant borer is ready to mate, it is then much
more likely to mate with one of the more numerous Bt-susceptible moths than
another relatively rare Bt-resistant one.
"We hope this will keep corn borers from becoming resistant to Bt
corn," Wedberg says.
Although the Bt corn seed costs only about $5 per acre more than other
hybrids, Wedberg thinks some farmers can be as profitable with current farm
management as they can with the Bt corn.
"Over the past 20 years, the borer has been a serious pest on only
about 10 percent of the corn acreage in Wisconsin,'' Wedberg says. "Most
of us only remember the abnormally high populations during 1995 and 1996.
In parts of the state corn fields historically average less than one borer
per corn plant going into the winter. In those areas, borers are not likely
to cause more than a five percent reduction in yield. Farmers there may
want to think twice about changing their management."
|