 |
Biopharm Issues and News Analysis
|
|
Prodigene case
Prodigene's website
Ames briefing by FDA
Des Moines Register clippings
BIO's website
Iowa Corn Growers
Back to BioPharm
Back to SEE Biotech
|
Links, clippings, analysis and comment |
| Disclaimer: This information is from Dr. Foley's slide set hand out. This should not be construed as an official USDA document, and is presented here for your information only. |
Iowa State University
Public Forum on Pharmaceutical Crops
Regulatory Considerations for Transgenic Plant Veterinary Vaccines
Pat Foley, DVM, PhD
Center for Veterinary Biologics
Veterinary Services
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
United States Department of Agriculture
Ames, Iowa, USA
|
- Plants as Bioreactors
- Potential for high levels of accumulated recombinant proteins
- Glycosylation differences apparently not problematic for at least some proteins
- Comparmentalization within the cell
- Natural storage stability in certain organs
- No contamination from animal byproducts
- Ease of delivery: feed not injection, no cold chain requirement
|
- Progression of Transgenic Plant Constructs
- 1st: Production traits-
- Bt corn
- Roundup Ready soybeans
- 2nd: Nutrition-added crops-
- Vitamin A rice
- lycopene tomato
- 3rd: Pharmaceuticals, enzymes & biologics-
- TGEV corn,
- LT-B potato
- 4th: ?
|
- Types of Plant-Based Biologics
- Vaccines
- Feed-based for oral mucosal immunization
- Whole plant or partial plant
- Purified protein
- Parenteral subunit or feed additive
- Plantibodies
- Diagnostic kit components
- Antigens, plantibodies
|
Transgenic Plant Proteins for Animal Vaccines
- Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus
- VP60 in potato (injection)
- Foot-and-mouth disease virus
- VP1 in Arabidopsis (injection)
- VP1 in alfalfa (injection, oral)
- Transmissible gastroenteritis virus
- S protein in Arabidopsis (injection)
- S protein in tobacco (injection)
- S protein in maize (oral)
|
Safety Issues
- Risk assessment process
- Environmental effects
- Non-target animals
- Pollen drift: spatial & temporal confinement
- Accidental release to food/feed facility
- Viable/nonviable material
- Health risk: toxin, allergen, immunotolerance?
- Loss of public confidence in segregation
|
Factors in Confinement Measures for Corn
- 1/4 mile separation reduces gene flow>99.5%
- Pollen (male) sheds 10-14 days, viable for 3-24 hours
- Ear silks (female) receptive for 14 days
- 1 mile for corn seed production, .5 mile from corn, 21 days from other plantings within .5 to 1 mile of the transgenic plants
|
Draft Document #1
- OSTP, 8/2/02-Proposed Fed. Actions to:
- Update field test requirements for biotech-derived plants intended for food/feed use
- Establish early food safety assessments for new proteins produced by such plants
- Oversight-APHIS, FDA, EPA
- Location: http://www.OSTP.gov/html/redregbio.html
|
Office of Science & Technology Policy Draft
- For premarket, experimental use
- Level of confinement consistent with risk
- Prevent low levels of genes and gene products in commercial seed, commodities, processed food/feed until appropriate safety standards can be met
- FDA: website to list all evaluated proteins
- USDA: transparency of regulatory process
|
Pharm Plant? Regulation
- APHIS/BRS: permits for importation, interstate movement, field testing
- Inspections: labs, greenhouses, field sites
- These plants not to be de-regulated
- Field production under Federal oversight
- Case-by-case analysis: unique products from differing plants, sometimes using GE?d plant viruses
|
Draft Document #2
USDA/FDA, 9/12/02-Guidance for Industry
- Drugs, biologics, and medical devices derived from bioengineered plants
- For use in humans and animals
- Locations:
-
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/cvb/
-
http://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm
-
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm
|
Guidance Document as it applies to US Vet. Biological Product License
- Characterize: rDNA, transformation system, genetic stability, expression (detection assay), tissue distribution
-
Recommended: genetic s (color, leaf pattern), auxotrophic , tissue-specific and inducible promoters
-
Accounting for total yield of seed
-
Disposal: 9 CFR 114.15, VS Memo 800.56
|
Manufacturing Procedures
- Propagation & purification
- Growth conditions & harvest
- Transfer & storage conditions
- Initial processing, extraction, aseptic processing
- Cleaning between harvests
- Characterization of the final product, including stability
|
Production Considerations
- Meet EPA, USDA, FDA containment levels
- Best if surrounding fields under firm control: their yield cannot go into food/feed chain if temporal & spatial distance not maintained
- Outline must state pesticide, herbicide use
- Serial: mixed as a batch of representative sampling to demonstrate homogeneity
- For whole fruit or vegetable, homogenize for uniform bulk substance: puree, juice, milled grain
|
Commercial Production
- Procedures so no entry into food/feed without FDA or CVB clearances
- Identity preservation system
- Seeds: shipping to planting
- Plants: harvest to product use
- Tests to detect the target gene and the protein product in the raw agricultural commodity
- Consumer use of a consistent product
- Ground into a crude prep (additive), purified, or consumed directly as a food/feed product
|
Requirements of Oral Vaccines
- Purity: within accepted levels for mycotoxins, pesticides, herbicides, soil-borne contaminants, naturally occurring plant toxins, etc.
- Safety: overdose study/tolerance but not reversion-to-virulence; field safety trial
- Potency: measure, ID protective Ag or Ab in bulk or finished product
|
Efficacy Requirements
- Same as for conventional products
- Based on label claim
- "prevents infection with (microorganism)"
- "for prevention of disease due to (microbe)"
- "as an aid in the prevention of (disease)"
- "as an aid in the reduction of (disease)"
- Requires vaccination/challenge of fully susceptible host animals: sufficient numbers at minimum age on label, potency of efficacy serial established prior to V/C
|
Labeling of Transgenic Veterinary Biologics
- Label claims will need to meet 9 CFR 112 label requirements (adapted)
- Directions for use: dosage, frequency, administration, minimum age
- Claims for protection
- Storage conditions and expiration date
- Warnings, cautions, and restrictions
|
CVB: Biologics Testing
- VST Act, 1913: pure, safe, potent, effective
- Amended, 1985 by FSA: include distribution of all vet biologics in US & for export
- Case-by-case analysis
- Target animal safety:
-
Tolerance induction, reproductive safety, response in young/old, toxin, allergen
- Environmental safety:
- Use, manufacture, disposal
|
|