Biopharm

Issues and News Analysis

From SEE Biotech and BioTrek at the University of Wisconsin-Madison


Prodigene case

Prodigene's website

Ames briefing by FDA

Des Moines Register clippings

BIO's website

Iowa Corn Growers

Back to BioPharm

Back to SEE Biotech
Links, clippings, analysis and comment
Disclaimer: This information is from Dr. Foley's slide set hand out. This should not be construed as an official USDA document, and is presented here for your information only.

Iowa State University

Public Forum on Pharmaceutical Crops

Regulatory Considerations for Transgenic Plant Veterinary Vaccines

Pat Foley, DVM, PhD
Center for Veterinary Biologics
Veterinary Services
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
United States Department of Agriculture
Ames, Iowa, USA
Plants as Bioreactors
Potential for high levels of accumulated recombinant proteins
Glycosylation differences apparently not problematic for at least some proteins
Comparmentalization within the cell
Natural storage stability in certain organs
No contamination from animal byproducts
Ease of delivery: feed not injection, no cold chain requirement
Progression of Transgenic Plant Constructs
1st: Production traits-
Bt corn
Roundup Ready soybeans
2nd: Nutrition-added crops-
Vitamin A rice
lycopene tomato
3rd: Pharmaceuticals, enzymes & biologics-
TGEV corn,
LT-B potato
4th: ?
Types of Plant-Based Biologics
Vaccines
Feed-based for oral mucosal immunization
Whole plant or partial plant
Purified protein
Parenteral subunit or feed additive
Plantibodies
Diagnostic kit components
Antigens, plantibodies

Transgenic Plant Proteins for Animal Vaccines

Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus
VP60 in potato (injection)
Foot-and-mouth disease virus
VP1 in Arabidopsis (injection)
VP1 in alfalfa (injection, oral)
Transmissible gastroenteritis virus
S protein in Arabidopsis (injection)
S protein in tobacco (injection)
S protein in maize (oral)

Safety Issues

Risk assessment process
Environmental effects
Non-target animals
Pollen drift: spatial & temporal confinement
Accidental release to food/feed facility
Viable/nonviable material
Health risk: toxin, allergen, immunotolerance?
Loss of public confidence in segregation

Factors in Confinement Measures for Corn

1/4 mile separation reduces gene flow>99.5%
Pollen (male) sheds 10-14 days, viable for 3-24 hours
Ear silks (female) receptive for 14 days
1 mile for corn seed production, .5 mile from corn, 21 days from other plantings within .5 to 1 mile of the transgenic plants

Draft Document #1

OSTP, 8/2/02-Proposed Fed. Actions to:
Update field test requirements for biotech-derived plants intended for food/feed use
Establish early food safety assessments for new proteins produced by such plants
Oversight-APHIS, FDA, EPA
Location: http://www.OSTP.gov/html/redregbio.html

Office of Science & Technology Policy Draft

For premarket, experimental use
Level of confinement consistent with risk
Prevent low levels of genes and gene products in commercial seed, commodities, processed food/feed until appropriate safety standards can be met
FDA: website to list all evaluated proteins
USDA: transparency of regulatory process

Pharm Plant? Regulation

APHIS/BRS: permits for importation, interstate movement, field testing
Inspections: labs, greenhouses, field sites
These plants not to be de-regulated
Field production under Federal oversight
Case-by-case analysis: unique products from differing plants, sometimes using GE?d plant viruses

Draft Document #2

USDA/FDA, 9/12/02-Guidance for Industry
Drugs, biologics, and medical devices derived from bioengineered plants
For use in humans and animals
Locations:
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/cvb/
http://www.fda.gov/cber/guidelines.htm
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm

Guidance Document as it applies to US Vet. Biological Product License

Characterize: rDNA, transformation system, genetic stability, expression (detection assay), tissue distribution
Recommended: genetic
About us
SEE Mail
BioPharm
Tools
Links
Search
Home
Papers
Evaluation
The Grant
Webmaster
s (color, leaf pattern), auxotrophic
About us
SEE Mail
BioPharm
Tools
Links
Search
Home
Papers
Evaluation
The Grant
Webmaster
, tissue-specific and inducible promoters
Accounting for total yield of seed
Disposal: 9 CFR 114.15, VS Memo 800.56

Manufacturing Procedures

Propagation & purification
Growth conditions & harvest
Transfer & storage conditions
Initial processing, extraction, aseptic processing
Cleaning between harvests
Characterization of the final product, including stability

Production Considerations

Meet EPA, USDA, FDA containment levels
Best if surrounding fields under firm control: their yield cannot go into food/feed chain if temporal & spatial distance not maintained
Outline must state pesticide, herbicide use
Serial: mixed as a batch of representative sampling to demonstrate homogeneity
For whole fruit or vegetable, homogenize for uniform bulk substance: puree, juice, milled grain

Commercial Production

Procedures so no entry into food/feed without FDA or CVB clearances
Identity preservation system
Seeds: shipping to planting
Plants: harvest to product use
Tests to detect the target gene and the protein product in the raw agricultural commodity
Consumer use of a consistent product
Ground into a crude prep (additive), purified, or consumed directly as a food/feed product

Requirements of Oral Vaccines

Purity: within accepted levels for mycotoxins, pesticides, herbicides, soil-borne contaminants, naturally occurring plant toxins, etc.
Safety: overdose study/tolerance but not reversion-to-virulence; field safety trial
Potency: measure, ID protective Ag or Ab in bulk or finished product

Efficacy Requirements

Same as for conventional products
Based on label claim
"prevents infection with (microorganism)"
"for prevention of disease due to (microbe)"
"as an aid in the prevention of (disease)"
"as an aid in the reduction of (disease)"
Requires vaccination/challenge of fully susceptible host animals: sufficient numbers at minimum age on label, potency of efficacy serial established prior to V/C

Labeling of Transgenic Veterinary Biologics

Label claims will need to meet 9 CFR 112 label requirements (adapted)
Directions for use: dosage, frequency, administration, minimum age
Claims for protection
Storage conditions and expiration date
Warnings, cautions, and restrictions

CVB: Biologics Testing

VST Act, 1913: pure, safe, potent, effective
Amended, 1985 by FSA: include distribution of all vet biologics in US & for export
Case-by-case analysis
Target animal safety:
Tolerance induction, reproductive safety, response in young/old, toxin, allergen
Environmental safety:
Use, manufacture, disposal


From The University of Wisconsin-Madison
Sponsored by a grant from USDA/CSREES/IFAFS
Copyright © 2003 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
Created: November 25, 2002
Last updated December 9, 2002
Hosted by the UWBC Web server